The Federal Reserve acts as a manager of the economy, much like a state manages its wildlife resources. When the Fed wants to stimulate economic activity and create jobs, it lowers interest rates, which is functionally similar to "printing money." This makes capital cheap and abundant, encouraging businesses to borrow for expansion and consumers to spend. This new spending creates demand for workers, driving unemployment down. This action is akin to the state of Ohio deciding it wants to increase the "opportunity" for people to hunt. To achieve this, it dramatically increases the number of available hunting licenses.
However, this stimulation has a critical side effect: devaluation. In the economy, when the Fed floods the market with new dollars, that money chases a finite amount of goods and services. With more dollars bidding for the same items, prices rise—this is inflation. Each individual dollar loses its purchasing power. This directly mirrors the hunting license scenario. If Ohio issues only one license for its entire herd of 800,000 deer, that single license is priceless. But if the state issues 400,000 licenses for that same herd, the "opportunity" is widespread, but the value of each individual license has plummeted; each hunter now only has a theoretical claim on two deer.
The fundamental constraint in both situations is the clear line between demand and supply. The Federal Reserve can easily print money to increase the demand for goods, but it cannot build more factories, grow more food, or stock more shelves to increase the supply. Similarly, the state of Ohio can print an infinite number of hunting licenses to increase the demand for hunting, but it cannot magically create more deer. In both cases, when the manufactured demand (dollars or licenses) drastically outpaces the real-world supply (goods or deer), the value of the token used to access that supply—whether it's a dollar bill or a hunting permit—inevitably falls.